Contemporary Leadership Styles

Sberbank CEO – Leader that created change

The manager’s qualities are not only measured by level of technical skills or expertise in the subject, but as to what extent every manager is a leader. Some scientists like Mintzberg even do not accept a distinction between the manager and the leader arguing that only leaders can manage efficiently (Mintzberg, 2009). Nevertheless, this blog will explain and discuss contemporary leadership theory at a closer glace and discuss on a case of Sberbank CEO and Chairman of the Executive Board (Sberbank, 2020) what value strong leadership has for an effective change.


Evolution of Leadership Theories

The nature of work in organizations was changing and the focus mowed from directional commands, achieving results by being controlled into a teamwork behavior. It includes coaching, support and empowerment. Consequently, the value of leadership and emphasize on it were growing (Mullins, 2016). Earlier view, emerged in the first half of the twentieth century and proposed by Kurt Lewin, distinguished three main leadership styles (the way in which the functions of leadership are carried out):

  • Autocratic style: centralized authority, low participation
  • Democratic style: involvement, high participation, feedback
  • Laissez faire style: hands-off management

(Robbins, 2012)

However, the understanding of leadership theory evolved in order to meet modern realities. The change happened because of various factors such as: globalization, improved education level and overall technology progress. As a result, contemporary view on leadership started to distinguish two types transactional and transformational. According to Robbins the first is – leaders who guide or motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements. The second is – leaders who inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the organization by clarifying role and task requirements (Robbins, 2012).

Culture and Leadership | Joseph Trimble | TEDxWWU
(Culture and Leadership, 2015)

About Contemporary Leadership Styles

Transforming leaders have very strong values. Leaders of this type are more likely to educate people using their values and help them grow professionally to achieve the required results. In order to attract followers, a conflict can be used that helps to elevate people up and help them reconsider their own values and needs (Day, 2012).

Bass understood transactional leadership as based on conditional compensation. It takes place by rewarding in return for meeting performance levels agreed with the leader. The intervention of a leader in this case occurs only when the agreements or established standards are not respected (Bass, 1993). Transactional leadership appeals to the self-interest of followers. It is based on a relationship of mutual dependence and an exchange process of ‘I will give you this, if you do that.’ (Mullins, 2016)

The table below summarizes the opposite traits of the two leadership styles:


Both contemporary styles can be criticized; for instance, critics question the ethics of the very idea of transformational leadership. Keeley argued that transformational leadership is well and good as long as you assume that everyone will eventually come around to the values and goals of the leader (Kelly, 1992).

According to Mullins many writers see transformational leadership the same thing as charismatic or visionary, but arguably those two can be considered as a new approach of leadership (Mullins, 2016).

  • Charismatic – An enthusiastic, self-confident leader whose personality and actions influence people to behave in certain ways.
  • Visionary – A leader who creates and articulates a realistic, credible, and attractive vision of the future that improves upon the present situation.

(Robbins, 2012)

Association of leaders with vison and inspiration is increasing, its extent can measure the success of a transformational leadership (Mullins, 2016).


Role of a Leader for a Change

Evans suggested that leadership style can be chosen, and the choice is usually based on assumptions made by the selector. The factors for the choice are assumptions about people and organization itself.  It has an important implication on team members, which leadership style is used. The reason of its importance is that it will create organizational culture and define most of the processes such as: decision making, supervision and organizational change (Evans, 1996).

In this blog we will discuss example of a leadership on Sberbank CEO and Chairman of the Executive Board Herman Gref (Sberbank, 2020).  Over the 12 years of German Gref’s leadership, the oldest bank in Russia has made a real technological breakthrough and turned into a modern financial structure with a developed service system that is worthy of competing in the global banking market (Glavportal, 2019).

Sberbank CEO sees the main challenge for him today as the management of change which should happen faster than the environment changes (Ivanyushchenkova, 2016). One of Mr. Gref’s statements about himself is: “We very often try to change the world around us … The most important tool for changing the world is you yourself. A simple thesis: if you want to change the world – start with yourself, forget about any changes around” (Izvestiya, 2019).  Mr. Gref emphasizes that true leaders should engage in self-development and be able to interest followers in his activities. According to the head of Sberbank, the ability to infect people so that their eyes “light up” so that they want to “become like you” is extremely important, but extremely difficult (Izvestiya, 2019).


Photo: Eugene Razumny / Vedomosti

As a leader Gref is characterized controversially. Forbes wrote about Gref that with his legendary ability to work, working 16 hours a day, he plunged into the affairs of Sberbank and first of all set three goals: to become a banker, create a team and focus Sberbank on effective work (Forbes, 2019). Alexander Torbakhov, the former head of the Retail Business block, explained: “I have met many prominent people, but Gref’s personality is unique in both positive and negative sense!” It is not easy to work with such a leader as CEO of Sberbank. He not only works hard and expects the same from others but is also very self-confident and words things strongly (Forbes, 2019). However, one of the CEO’s deputies says: “The fascination of what we do with him at Sberbank compensates for all these inconveniences” (Forbes, 2019).

Conclusion

The leadership theory is evolving and will further progress to satisfy the needs of the changing environment. As well as new characteristics emerge to explain the nature and variety of leader’s traits.

When we look at the Sberbank CEO case, apparently, Mr. Gref sees transformation as the most efficient and preferred way of leadership; however, he is balancing it with transactional approach, which might ensure faster and guaranteed results.

And what do you think of yourself as a leader?

References

Bass, B. a. A. B., 1993. Transformational leadership: A response to critique. San Diego: Academia Press, Inc..

Day, D. V., 2012. Ethics Effectiveness: The Nature of Good. [Online]
Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4923/6d315c7306c029f29c3efc7616c8740705ba.pdf
[Accessed 17 March 2020].

Culture and Leadership. 2015. [Film] s.l.: TED.

Evans, T. J., 1996. Transformational Leadership: Overview of a Human Resources Administrative Practice. [Online]
Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED402640.pdf
[Accessed 17 March 2020].

Forbes, 2019. “Floppy empires are crumbling.” How German Gref changed Sberbank. [Online]
Available at: https://www.forbes.ru/karera-i-svoy-biznes/375607-nepovorotlivye-imperii-rushatsya-kak-german-gref-menyal-sberbank
[Accessed 18 March 2020].

Glavportal, 2019. German Gref: “The main thing today is the competition of management models”. [Online]
Available at: https://glavportal.com/materials/german-gref-glavnoe-segodnya-konkurenciya-modelej-upravleniya/
[Accessed 18 March 2020].

Ivanyushchenkova, M., 2016. German Gref: “The Russian management style is ineffective, but effective”. [Online]
Available at: https://hbr-russia.ru/liderstvo/psikhologiya/a17082
[Accessed 21 March 2020].

Izvestiya, 2019. Gref listed the qualities of a true leader. [Online]
Available at: https://iz.ru/856356/2019-03-14/gref-perechislil-kachestva-nastoiashchego-lidera
[Accessed 18 March 2020].

Kelly, R. E., 1992. The power of followership. New York: Doubleday.

Mintzberg, H., 2009. Managing. s.l.:Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Mullins, L. J., 2016. Management & Organisational Behaviour. Eleventh edition ed. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

Robbins, S. P., 2012. Management. 11th edition ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc..

Sberbank, 2020. Sberbank Corporate Website. [Online]
Available at: https://www.sberbank.com/index
[Accessed 21 March 2020].

Can cultures be managed within organizations?

Sberbank: Changing Culture and Role of its Leader

What is Culture?

Egan G. gives following definition of culture – the assumptions, beliefs, values and norms that drive ‘the way we do things here’ – is the largest and most controlling of the systems because it affects not only overt organizational behavior but also the shadow-side behavior . . . (Egan, 1993). In a broader sense culture can be seen from national or organizational angles. This blog emphasizes on organizational culture in order to see what role it plays nowadays and how companies overcome challenges when they transform culture.

Defining Organizational Culture and its Types

According to Laurie J. Mullin organizational culture is a collection of traditional values, policies, beliefs and attitudes that create a context for everything individuals do and think in an organization.

 (Organisational Culture – Eats strategy for breakfast, 2018)

Companies must undergo regular transformations and changes in order to remain competitive and succeed in the rivalries. In order to be ready for change they have to diagnose their culture, health and performance, and the ability of the organization to adapt. As Mullins stated the leaders of the organizations need to be aware of the effects and impacts of organizational culture and climates within the teams (Mullins, 2016). Harrison Handy gives four main types of organizational culture: Power culture, Role culture, Task culture, Person culture (Handy, 1993).

Role of the Organizational Culture and its Background

The concept of organizational culture gains its importance every year as it directly impacts the success of modern public and private organizations. Companies can no longer afford ignoring it and organizational culture becomes one of the priorities. Its affect stretches from performance, sustainability to development of the business through ideas and implementations born within the organization. According to Arkhipova big companies try to develop and formalize its organizational culture through values, mission statement and code of conduct whereas by small enterprises it might still be present and formed by employees and management (Arkhipova, 2020).

Considering the fast progress and changes of the modern society companies have to adopt and change their cultures. Any running change in the organization needs to be in harmony with its organizational culture. Pillars for a success will consist of openness, participation and ability to accept new ideas (Mullins, 2016).

We will talk about Russian company, which demonstrated extraordinary progress and change achieved partly through its evolution of its organizational culture. 

Sberbank Changing Culture

Sberbank a state-owned Russian banking and financial services company headquartered in Moscow that succeeded over the last years and managed to transform. According to Seddon Sberbank was considered an archaic and corrupt organization whose future wasn’t optimistic, and belief was that the situation might change (Seddon, 2018). However, years later even the Kremlin opposition leader Alexei Navalny admitted the improvements and efforts of the bank to undergo changes (Seddon, 2018).


KINGS OF THE CASTLE: RUSSIAN STOCKS’ MARKET CAP (USD mn, end of period)
(Aris, 2019)

Sberbank is one of the leading financial organizations worldwide and is the largest bank in Russia, Central and Eastern Europe. Sberbank has a unique footprint in Russia with its 11 regional subdivisions and 14,200 branches that cover 83 Russia’s regions. Number of employees in 2020 is 278000 (Sberbank, 2020).

The changes of Sberbank over the last decade are noticeable and especially from the customers’ perspective. It’s no longer an old-fashion institution, but a modern financial services organization with an incredible geography in Russia in CIS. As any organization Sberbank has its unique culture, which has undergone transformation in the new century in order for organization to succeed. In fact, its culture might still be a mix of different types identified by Handy and each can find its example depending on the area within the organization. However, by Sberbank the prevailing form is a role culture with a strong authoritarian leader on the top. Sberbank clearly formalized its mission and values in order to achieve it and executes various of measures to sustain and develop the efficient culture.

(Sberbank, 2020)

In the strategy for 2020 Sberbank sated that it aims to move from bureaucracy and rigid hierarchy to a teamwork, it had been earlier promised by deputy chairman of the board Yulia Chapurina on the management forum “Winning The Hearts”. According to Vedomosti the feedback of employees showed that corporate culture within the bank lacks humanity, respect, openness and cooperation (Vedomosti, 2017).

In its annual report for 2016 Sberbank emphasized on the role of culture and its development “The development of corporate culture is one of the key areas of Sberbank Strategy. This involves the formation of principles and norms of behavior that meet the mission and values of Sberbank, as well as contribute to the achievement of business goals” (Sberbank, 2017).

The goals set By Sberbank were oriented towards

  • continuous feedback for team self-development and development;
  • learning the basics of corporate culture and emotional intelligence;
  • social projects, both employee-oriented and significant for society;
  • the introduction of corporate culture in all HR processes.

Chernykh S. in his research “Corporate Culture in Russia” stated that corporate education was the main factor determining the philosophy of organization (Chernykh, 2017). He believes that formation of management culture determines the organizational culture and that the experience of Sberbank in changing corporate culture and launch of corporate education was significant. Sberbank officially opened its corporate university in March 2012 (Chernykh, 2017).

Sberbank – Role of the leader

Herman Gref, the President, Chairman of the Management Board of PJSC Sberbank, Executive Director of Sberbank who is ruling the bank since 2007 played probably the key roles in changing and improving the organizational culture of the bank (Seddon, 2018). Following the initiatives of Herman Gref to fulfill the cultural revolution in the organization, the top management of Sberbank are making annual studies at Stanford University’s business school and visit start-ups. Mr. Gref himself was characterized as an autocratic manager ‘a benign, well intentioned dictator’ (Seddon, 2018).

As stated in Vedomosti the management style of Mr. Gref (the Chairman of the Management Board of PJSC Sberbank, Executive Director of Sberbank) is far from being agile and does not follow the trend of organizations where there is a lot freedom with less job descriptions and KPI (Vedomosti, 2017). It is rather a rigid vertical structure, locked on the personality of Gref. However, on lower levels, Sberbank managed to build a culture based on mechanisms oriented towards projects and tasks. Here Sberbank is way ahead of other banks (Vedomosti, 2017).

Historically being a liberal economist, Gref had to turn into an authoritarian ruler: he had to set the rhythm of change by his own example. “When you need to reform something efficiently and in a short time, you don’t need democracy. Perhaps you need a dictator. ” says one of the people close to Gref (Vedomosti, 2017)

Herman Gref

Organizational Culture: What is next ?

The role of the organizational culture will sustain its trend and the importance of it will be acknowledged by more organizations. Companies give efforts to the formation and transformation of cultures because they understand the impact of this phenomenon.

The case of Sberbank illustrates that to a certain extent and as a matter of need the culture can be managed and undergo transformations even by such large and historically bureaucratic organizations. It also shows how a strong leader might play a crucial role to induce changes and execute cultural shift. In my understanding, leaders must lead the changes of cultures and Sberbank took the right way starting with education programs for its managers. I agree to the authors of “The Leader’s Guide to Corporate Culture” that the first and most important step leader can take to maximize value and minimize risks is to become fully aware of how organizational culture works (Harvard Business Review, 2020). This is applicable to Sberbank, whose educational programs should help its leaders to gain awareness and contribute to the further cultural upgrades.

Sberbank should pay attention to such aspects within organization as openness, respect and cooperation. Sberbank is on its way and should further transform the culture by upgrading upper levels to task oriented as it did for the lower level.



Sberbank Customer service point, Reception

References

  1. Aris, B., 2019. Russia Matters. [Online]
    Available at: https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/russias-stock-market-rallies-still-not-source-long-term-capital
    [Accessed 22 February 2020].
  2. Arkhipova, O., 2020. Delat Delo: Online edition. [Online]
    Available at: https://delatdelo.com/organizaciya-biznesa/korporativnaya-kultura-sberbanka.html
    [Accessed 19 February 2020].
  3. Chernykh, S. I., 2017. Corporate Culture in Russia – History, Progress, Problems and Prospects. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 24 March.
  4. Egan, G., 1993. The Shadow Side. Management Today.
  5. Handy, C., 1993. Understanding Organizations. fourth edition ed. s.l.:Penguin.
  6. Mullins, L. J., 2016. Management and Organisational Behaviour. 11th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  7. Organisational Culture – Eats strategy for breakfast. 2018. [Film] s.l.: Ducere Global Business School.
  8. Sberbank, 2017. Annual Report 2016. [Online]
    Available at: https://2016.report-sberbank.ru/ru/results-overview/employees/culture-and-development
    [Accessed 16 February 2020].
  9. Sberbank, 2020. Corporate. [Online]
    Available at: https://www.sberbank.com/about
    [Accessed 19 February 2020].
  10. Seddon, M., 2018. Financial Times. [Online]
    Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/3450c840-c0a4-11e8-95b1-d36dfef1b89a
    [Accessed 16 February 2020].
  11. Vedomosti, 2017. What German Gref turned Sberbank into 10 years. [Online]
    Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/articles/2017/12/04/743989-gref-sberbank
    [Accessed 22 February 2020].

Appendices

P.S.

I call readers to leave feedback and comment:

  • What do you think helped Sberbank to overcome the transformation challenge and turn from a poor customers service public financial institution into one of the most developed and customers-oriented banks in Russia?
  • How do you find the role of corporate education for creating a better and more efficient cultures?
  • How do you find the role of a leader in the organizational culture?
  • How do you change the culture around being a leader in the organization?

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started